The Cake on the Counter: Why Seller Love Letters Can Create Fair Housing Problems

cake on counter

The Cake on the Counter: Why Seller Love Letters Can Create Fair Housing Problems

Imagine you’re committed to a healthy diet.

You’ve spent weeks making good decisions. You’re eating well, exercising, and staying focused on your goals.

Then someone places a giant chocolate cake on your kitchen counter.

Technically, the cake itself isn’t wrong. Cake isn’t illegal. Cake isn’t harmful sitting there on the counter.

But suddenly you’ve been given information that makes following your original plan much harder.

That’s a little like what happens when buyers write personal letters to sellers.

For years, buyers were encouraged to submit heartfelt letters explaining why they loved a home. They might share photos of their family, talk about their children, describe their future dreams, or explain why the home feels perfect for their lifestyle.

The letter itself may be completely innocent.

The problem is what happens next.

Fair Housing laws exist to ensure that housing decisions are not based on protected characteristics such as race, religion, national origin, familial status, disability, sex, and other protected classes under applicable laws.

When a seller receives a personal letter, they are often exposed to information that has nothing to do with the offer itself.

They may learn:

  • Whether a buyer has children.
  • Whether a buyer is married.
  • Whether the buyer is part of a same-sex couple.
  • The buyer’s ethnicity or cultural background.
  • The buyer’s religion.
  • The buyer’s age.
  • Whether the buyer has a disability.

Now the seller has information they were never supposed to use when choosing an offer.

The letter is the cake sitting on the counter.

The temptation has been introduced.

A seller may genuinely believe they are making an emotional decision rather than a discriminatory one. They may feel connected to a buyer’s story or want the home to go to someone who shares their values or lifestyle.

The issue is that Fair Housing laws don’t allow housing decisions to be based on those factors.

In fact, seller letters can even backfire.

One of the biggest mistakes buyers make is assuming they know what will resonate with a seller.

People are incredibly diverse. What appeals to one seller may have little impact on another.

A large family may be a source of joy for one seller and a source of concern for another. A retired seller may connect with another retiree, while an entrepreneur may admire another entrepreneur.

The problem is that buyers often assume they know who the seller is based on very limited information.

Maybe they notice family photos on the wall.

Maybe they see religious items displayed in the home.

Maybe they make assumptions based on a last name.

Maybe they notice children’s bedrooms or family memorabilia.

But assumptions are often wrong.

The seller may not be the person living in the home. The home may be owned by heirs, trustees, investors, or family members. Even when buyers correctly identify the seller, they still cannot know what matters most to that individual.

This creates an interesting side note about family photos during showings.

Some agents recommend removing family photos to help buyers envision themselves in the home.

Others leave them because they make a home feel warm and lived in.

There isn’t a universally right answer.

However, family photos can unintentionally reveal information about the seller’s protected characteristics while also encouraging buyers to make assumptions about who the seller is and what might persuade them.

In many cases, the strongest offer is still the one built on objective factors:

  • Price
  • Terms
  • Financing strength
  • Settlement flexibility
  • Inspection strategy
  • Overall likelihood of closing

Those are the factors sellers should be evaluating.

Not whether a buyer reminds them of themselves.

Not whether they share a similar lifestyle.

Not whether they like a family photo.

The best transactions happen when everyone focuses on the house, the contract, and the terms—not the personal characteristics of the people involved.

Because once the cake is on the counter, it becomes much harder to pretend it isn’t there.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Wayfaring Lancaster

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading